Best-Paper-Writing-Skill

让 AI 像最佳论文一样写Let AI write like a best paper: :

从 60 篇 CVPR / ICCV / NeurIPS 最佳论文中提炼写作规律。填一张表或贴一段摘要,得到有论证、有证据、不编造的论文底稿。

Writing patterns distilled from 60 CVPR / ICCV / NeurIPS award papers. Fill in a form or paste an abstract, and get a draft that argues, cites evidence and never invents results.

Why it works

不是一句“写得像论文”的提示词Not a "sound like a paper" prompt

通用 AI 的稿子彼此相似:铺背景、堆形容词、并排罗列组件。获奖论文不是这样写的,所以我们把它们的写法拆成了四件事。

Generic AI drafts look alike: background first, adjectives instead of mechanisms, parallel component lists. Award papers do not read that way.

01

向最佳论文学Learned from winners

逐段拆解 60 篇获奖论文的开头、缺口、洞察与节奏。

60 award papers (2021–2025), broken down paragraph by paragraph: opening, gap, insight, rhythm.

CVPRICCVNeurIPS2021–2025
02

8 类论证路线8 argument routes

先判断论文属于哪一类,再按这一类获奖论文的论证顺序动笔。

First decide what kind of paper it is, then argue in the order award papers of that kind use.

方法改进新能力规模规律再检验机理理论数据集测量
03

绝不编造Never invents

没给的数字、基线和引用一律写成 [TODO],留给你来填。

Numbers, baselines and references you did not give stay as [TODO] for you to fill.

beats L-DiT [TODO: cite]
FID: 18.65 → [TODO]
04

写完自检Self-check

对照获奖论文的统计逐条检查,并附上主张与证据的对照表。

Checked line by line against award-paper statistics, with a claim-evidence map.

✓开头具体,不铺背景Concrete opening✓每个缺口都有原因Every gap has a reason✓主张都有证据Every claim has evidence
From abstract to paper

提供你的想法/摘要,即可让论文落地Bring your idea or abstract, get a paper on the page

我们选取 CVPR 2026 的三篇最佳论文进行实验:只把摘要交给 Best-Paper-Writing-Skill,不提供原文,并且禁止联网和检索,由它独立写成完整底稿。

We test on three CVPR 2026 Best Papers: Best-Paper-Writing-Skill receives only the abstract, never the paper, and writes the full draft with web access and search disabled.

输入 · 原论文摘要Input · original abstract

Distilled from best papers

把 60 篇最佳论文,拆成一套写作秘诀Sixty best papers, distilled into one playbook

这不是一份论文清单。我们把获奖论文的摘要和引言逐句拆开:每一句在论证里做什么、按什么顺序出现、用什么节奏写。拆出来的规律都写进了 skill,生成每一段时都会对照。

We did not just collect these papers; we broke them down sentence by sentence: what each sentence does in the argument, in which order, at what rhythm. Those regularities are built into the skill and checked for every paragraph it writes.

1,929句逐句标注
摘要与引言,共 4.6 万词
sentences annotated
abstracts and intros, 46k words
475条可检索范例
论证动作 · 段落 · 句式
searchable exemplars
moves · paragraphs · frames
20项写作指标
按获奖论文的分布自检
style metrics
checked against award papers
8类论证路线
按论文类型自动选择
argument routes
chosen by paper type
01
先肯定,再指缺口Credit first, then the gap

100% 的引言先具体肯定前人工作,98% 随后写出缺口及其原因。skill 也按这个顺序写。

100% of the introductions credit specific prior work first; 98% then state the gap and its cause. The skill writes in the same order.

02
洞察是观察,不是口号An insight is an observation

78% 在方法前写出关于问题本身的判断,只有 7% 用“our key insight is”。skill 直接写判断。

78% state an observation about the problem before the method; only 7% say “our key insight is”. The skill states the observation.

03
点名最接近的工作Name the closest work

58% 在方法之后点名最接近的工作,并给出一个可核查的差异。方法论文 skill 必写这一句。

58% name the closest work after the method with one checkable difference. The skill always writes it for method papers.

04
摘要短而具体Short, concrete abstracts

中位数 174 词、7 句、只有 1 个数字。skill 的检查脚本按这些范围逐项报警。

Median 174 words, 7 sentences, one number. The skill’s checker flags drafts outside these ranges.

查看 60 篇论文清单See the 60 papersCVPR 22 · ICCV 12 · NeurIPS 26 · 2021–2025▾▴
VenuePaperType
Before / after

用了 Skill,摘要读起来像获奖论文With the skill, the abstract reads like an award paper

把同一份 LoRA 论文信息,分别交给普通提示词和 Best-Paper-Writing-Skill,对比写出的摘要与引言。

The same LoRA facts go to a plain prompt and to Best-Paper-Writing-Skill. Compare the abstracts and introductions they write.

AI 套话AI cliché获奖论文式写法Award-paper move
普通提示词Plain prompt

Large language models have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of natural language processing tasks. However, as models continue to grow in size, fully fine-tuning all model parameters for each downstream task becomes increasingly impractical, making it prohibitively expensive to deploy multiple fine-tuned instances. In this paper, we propose Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), a novel and efficient approach that freezes the pre-trained model weights and injects trainable low-rank decomposition matrices into each layer of the Transformer architecture, significantly reducing the number of trainable parameters. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LoRA achieves comparable or even better performance than full fine-tuning on RoBERTa, DeBERTa, GPT-2, and GPT-3, while reducing trainable parameters by 10,000 times and GPU memory by 3 times, and introducing no additional inference latency. We also provide an empirical investigation into rank-deficiency in language model adaptation, providing insights into the effectiveness of LoRA. Our code and models are publicly available.

check_draft · 2 warnings泛泛开头;句尾分词短语 33%generic opening; 33% participial tails
Best-Paper-Writing-Skill

Serving one language model on many tasks means keeping one adapted copy per task, and at the scale of GPT-3 175B each copy is as large as the model itself. Adapter layers shrink the copy but run in sequence with the model, which adds inference latency, while prefix tuning pays for its trainable prefix with part of the input sequence. We observe that the weight change during adaptation has a low intrinsic rank, so a pair of small matrices can represent it. LoRA freezes the pre-trained weights, trains one such pair for each layer, and merges their product into the original weights at deployment. On GPT-3 175B, this efficient recipe cuts trainable parameters by 10,000 times and GPU memory by 3 times relative to fine-tuning with Adam, and it matches or exceeds fine-tuning quality on RoBERTa, DeBERTa, GPT-2 and GPT-3 with no added inference latency. A study of rank deficiency in adaptation explains why such small matrices are enough.

check_draft · 0 warnings具体开头;洞察直接陈述;主张与证据同句concrete opening; direct insight; claim with evidence
Leaderboard

装上 Skill,每个模型都离最佳论文更近With the skill, every model climbs closer to a best paper

4 个模型各写两版完整底稿,3 位评委匿名打 1–5 分。山顶 5 分,就是获奖论文的水平。

Four models each write two full drafts, with and without the skill, scored 1–5 by three blind judges. The summit, 5, is award-paper level.

Leaderboard
🏆
w/o Skillw/o Skill
w/ Skillw/ Skill
judges: Claude Sonnet · Claude Opus · GPT-Astra · Oct 2026
Usage

两种输入,一句话启动Two inputs, one sentence to start

缺的信息只问一次;问不到的写成 [TODO],绝不编造。

Missing information is asked once; what stays unknown becomes [TODO], never an invention.

方式 01 · 从零开始Mode 01 · start from scratch

填写离线信息表Fill the offline form

在本页下方的离线信息表里填好任务、失败原因、核心洞察和结果,导出 JSON 交给 agent。数据只存在你的浏览器里。

Fill the offline form further down this page with task, failure, insight and results, then export the JSON for your agent. Data stays in your browser.

对 agent 说Tell your agent

用 Best-Paper-Writing-Skill,根据这份信息表 JSON 写出论文的 Title、Abstract、Introduction、Methods 和 Experiments。

Use Best-Paper-Writing-Skill to write the Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods and Experiments from this intake JSON.

↓ 前往离线信息表(就在本页下方)↓ Go to the offline form (below on this page)
方式 02 · 已有摘要Mode 02 · you have an abstract

贴一段摘要Paste an abstract

把摘要贴给 agent。skill 先拆出其中已有、模糊和缺失的信息,追问一次,再写出完整底稿;摘要里没有的数字、基线和引用一律留作 [TODO]。

Paste your abstract. The skill finds what is present, vague or missing, asks once, then writes the full draft; numbers, baselines and citations the abstract does not give stay [TODO].

对 agent 说Tell your agent

用 Best-Paper-Writing-Skill,根据这段摘要写出论文的 Title、Abstract、Introduction、Methods 和 Experiments。

Use Best-Paper-Writing-Skill to write the Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods and Experiments from this abstract.

输出:完整底稿 + 摘要逐句修改对照表Output: the full draft and a sentence-by-sentence change table for the abstract
两种方式之后,skill 都会依次完成After either input, the skill runs
1
补全缺项Fill gaps只问一次ask once
2
选论证路线Pick a route8 类之一one of 8
3
对照范例起草Draft with exemplars学节奏,不抄句子rhythm, not sentences
4
自检与报告Check & reportcheck_draft.pycheck_draft.py
Offline form

离线信息表Offline intake form

填写你的工作信息,导出 JSON 交给 Best-Paper-Writing-Skill 生成论文底稿。支持中文,也可以直接粘贴幻灯片、实验表格和组会笔记。

Describe your work, export the JSON and give it to Best-Paper-Writing-Skill to write the draft. Chinese is fine, and you can paste slides, result tables or notes. (Interface in Chinese.)

5项必填required

填完就能导出,skill 能写出一份完整底稿。

Enough to export; the skill writes a full draft.

⭐ 8项推荐recommended

决定底稿有没有获奖论文的“韵味”;没填的 skill 会先追问一次。

They make it read like an award paper; the skill asks once for any you skip.

+补充信息optional

其余都是选填,默认折叠,按需展开;所有内容只保存在本浏览器中。

Everything else is optional and folded away; all of it stays in your browser.

补充的内容越详细,底稿质量越高。每多填一项,稿子里就少一个 [TODO];机制、公式和数字没有给出时,skill 只会标 [TODO],不会自行编造。The more you add, the better the draft. Every extra field removes a [TODO]; mechanisms, equations and numbers you do not give stay [TODO] and are never invented.

在新窗口打开 ↗Open in a new tab ↗

Install

三行命令装好Three lines to install

Claude 与 Codex 共用同一份 SKILL.md。装好后若看不到,重启 agent。

Claude and Codex share the same SKILL.md. Restart the agent if it does not appear.

git clone https://github.com/gulucaptain/Best-Paper-Writing-Skill.git
cd Best-Paper-Writing-Skill
./install.sh claude        # → ~/.claude/skills/bestpaper-writing

# 方式 01:填好离线信息表,导出 JSON 后
> 用 Best-Paper-Writing-Skill,根据这份信息表 JSON 写出论文的 Title、Abstract、Introduction、Methods 和 Experiments。

# 方式 02:已有摘要(在提示词后粘贴摘要)
> 用 Best-Paper-Writing-Skill,根据这段摘要写出论文的 Title、Abstract、Introduction、Methods 和 Experiments。# Mode 01: after exporting the intake JSON
> Use Best-Paper-Writing-Skill to write the Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods and Experiments from this intake JSON.

# Mode 02: you have an abstract (paste it after the prompt)
> Use Best-Paper-Writing-Skill to write the Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods and Experiments from this abstract.
Cite

引用Cite

如果它帮到了你的写作,欢迎引用,或者点一个 ⭐ Star。

If it helped your writing, please cite it or leave a ⭐.

@misc{zhao2026bestpaperwriting, title = {Best-Paper-Writing-Skill: Generating Best-Paper-Style Paper Drafts with Claude and Codex}, author = {Zhao, Haoyu}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/gulucaptain/Best-Paper-Writing-Skill}} }